Volume 4, Issue 3, September 2019, Page: 46-50
Comparative Analysis of Two Low Cost Graft Fixation Procedures in Pterygium Surgery in a Developing Country
Shreesha Kumar Kodavoor, Department of Cornea & Refractive Services, The Eye Foundation Hospital, Coimbatore, India
Raline Solomon Amalakaran, Post Graduate Resident, The Eye Foundation Hospital, Coimbatore, India
Dandapani Ramamurthy, Department Head, Cornea & Refractive Services, The Eye foundation Hospital, Coimbatore, India
Received: Jul. 8, 2019;       Accepted: Aug. 12, 2019;       Published: Aug. 23, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijovs.20190403.12      View  47      Downloads  10
Abstract
Aim: To compare surgical outcomes of pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft using Sutures and Autologous blood for primary pterygium. Materials and methods: Retrospective study done in 404 eyes with primary pterygium. Excision of the pterygium and conjunctival autograft fixation using sutures (group 1) or Autologous blood (group 2). Graft related complications such as recurrence, graft loss, graft retraction, granuloma were noted and compared between the two groups. Result: The average time taken for surgery was 10.66 ± 0.89 (group 1) and 10.44 ± 0.77 (group 2) (p=0.009). The recurrence rate following pterygium surgery was noted in 5eyes (2.5%) in group 1, and 10 eyes (4.9%) in group 2. Graft retraction was seen in 13 eyes in group 1,57 eyes in group 2, of the eyes with graft retraction only 2 eyes in group 1, and 7 eyes in group 2 developed recurrence (p=0.763). Graft loss was seen in 3eyes (1.49%) and in 7eyes (3.44%) in group 2, all patients who developed graft loss developed graft recurrence. Granuloma formation was seen in 2 eyes (0.99%) in group 1 and in 1eye (0.49%) in group 2. The cost of pterygium surgery using glue and autologous blood for conjunctival autograft fixation is much less than procuring and using fibrin glue. Conclusion: Fixing of graft and suturing it in place is important to prevent recurrence. Duration of surgical procedure is comparable. Recurrence and retraction rates are slightly higher in autologous blood group, but not statistically significant. Hence both sutures and autologous blood are very good treatment options for our patients with primary pterygium.
Keywords
Pterygium, Autologous Blood, Sutures, Autograft
To cite this article
Shreesha Kumar Kodavoor, Raline Solomon Amalakaran, Dandapani Ramamurthy, Comparative Analysis of Two Low Cost Graft Fixation Procedures in Pterygium Surgery in a Developing Country, International Journal of Ophthalmology & Visual Science. Vol. 4, No. 3, 2019, pp. 46-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ijovs.20190403.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Oldenburg JB, Garbus J, McDonnell JM, McDonnell PJ. Conjunctival pterygia: Mechanism of corneal topographic changes. Cornea. 1990; 9: 200-04.
[2]
Coroneo MT, Di Girolamo N, Wakefield D. The pathogenesis of pterygia. Current opinion in ophthalmology. 1999; 10 (4): 282-8.
[3]
D’Ombrain A. The surgical treatment of pterygium. Br J Ophthalmol. 1948; 32: 65-71.
[4]
Kunitomo N, Mori S. Studies on the pterygium: A treatment of the pterygium by mitomycin C instillation. Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn. 1963; 67: 601-07.
[5]
Mahar PS, Nwokora GE. Role of mitomycin C in pterygium surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993; 77: 433-35.
[6]
Kenyon KR, Wagoner MD, Hettinger ME. Conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology. 1985; 92: 1461-70.
[7]
Malik KP, Goel R, Gutpa A, Gupta SK, Kamal S, Mallik VK, et al. Efficacy of sutureless and glue-free limbal conjunctival autograft for primary pterygium surgery. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2012; 4: 230-35.
[8]
Koranyi G, Seregard S, Kopp ED. Cut and paste: A no suture, small incision approach to pterygium surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004; 88: 911-14.
[9]
Foroutan A, Beigzadeh F, Ghaempanah MJ, Eshghi P, Amirizadeh N, Sianati H, et al. Efficacy of autologous fibrin glue for primary pterygium surgery with conjunctival autograft. Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011; 23: 39-47.
[10]
Gilmore OJ, Reid C. Prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions: A comparison of noxythiolin and a new povidone‐iodine/PVP solution. British Journal of Surgery. 1979; 66 (3): 197-9.
[11]
Maheshwari S. Pterygium-induced corneal refractive changes. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2007; 55 (5): 383-386.
[12]
Adamis AP, Starck T, Kenyon KR. The management of pterygium. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 1990; 3: 611-23.
[13]
Suzuki T, Sano Y, Kinoshita S. Conjunctival inflammation induces Langerhans cell migration into the cornea. Current eye research. 2000; 21 (1): 550-3.
[14]
Ti SE, Chee SP, Dear KB, Tan DT. Analysis of variation in success rates in conjunctival autografting for primary and recurrent pterygium. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84: 385-89.
[15]
Kim HH, Mun JH, Park YJ, Lee KW, Shin PJ. Conjunctivolimbal autograft using a fibrin adhesive in pterygium surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2008; 22: 147-54.
[16]
Elwan SAM. Comparison between sutureless and glue-free versus sutured limbal conjunctival autograft in primary pterygium surgery. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014; 28: 292-98.
[17]
Ratnalingam V, Eu AL, Ng GL, Taharin R, John E. Fibrin adhesive is better than sutures in pterygium surgery. Cornea 2010; 29 (5): 485–9.
[18]
Uy HS, Reyes JM, Flores JD, Lim-Bon-Siong R. Comparison of fibrin glue and sutures for attaching conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 667–671.
[19]
Wit D, Athanasiadis I, Sharma A, Moore J. Sutureless and glue free conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery: a case series. Eye 2010; 24: 1474–1477.
[20]
Malik KPS, Goel R, Gupta A, Gupta SK, Kamal S, Malik VK, et al. Efficacy of sutureless and glue free limbal conjunctival autograft for primary pterygium surgery. Nepal J Ophthalmol 2012; 4 (8): 230–23.
[21]
Kurian A, Reghunadhan I, Nair KG. Autologous blood versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autograft adherence in sutureless pterygium surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015; 99 (4): 464-70.
[22]
Choudhury S, Dutta J, Mukhopadhyay S, Basu R, Bera S, Savale S, et al. Comparison of autologous in situ blood coagulum versus sutures for conjunctival autografting after pterygium excision. Int Ophthalmol. 2014; 34 (1): 41-48. 18.
[23]
Singh PK, Singh S, Vyas C, Singh M. Conjunctival autografting without fibrin glue or sutures for pterygium surgery. Cornea. 2013; 32 (1): 104-107.
[24]
Javadekar S et al. Autologus fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study. International Journal of Recent Trends in Science And Technology 2013; 7 (1): 1-5.
[25]
Sharma A, Raj H, Gupta A, Raina AV. Sutureless and glue-free versus sutures for Limbal Conjunctival autografting in primary Pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2015; 9 (11): NC06.
[26]
Bahar I, Weinberger D, Dan G, Avisar R. Pterygium surgery: fibrin glue versus Vicryl sutures for conjunctival closure. Cornea. 2006; 25 (10): 1168-72.
[27]
Machines IB. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. IBM Corp Armonk, NY; 2013.
[28]
Nangia V, Jonas JB, Nair D, Saini N, Nangia P, Panda-Jonas S. Prevalence and associated factors for pterygium in rural agrarian central India. The central India eye and medical study. PloS one. 2013 Dec 4; 8 (12): e82439.
[29]
Asokan R, Venkatasubbu RS, Velumuri L, Lingam V, George R. Prevalence and associated factors for pterygium and pinguecula in a South Indian population. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2012 Jan; 32 (1): 39-44.
Browse journals by subject